# Raymond Paul Lynch v. Virginia Parole Board

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · October 4, 1995 · 67 F.3d 295

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/705350

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 4, 1995
- **Citations:** 67 F.3d 295; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32506; 1995 WL 581105
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/705350

## Opinion text

67 F.3d 295
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Raymond Paul LYNCH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 95-6306.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 21, 1995.
Decided Oct. 4, 1995.
Raymond Paul Lynch, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lynch v. Virginia Parole Board, No. CA-94-707 (E.D.Va. Feb. 6, 1995). See Hill v. Jackson, --- F.3d ----, No. 94-6056 (4th Cir. Sept. 6, 1995). Additionally, we deny the Appellant's motion for an abbreviated briefing schedule as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/705350. Public record. Not legal advice.