# State ex rel. Worrell v. Peelle

> Indiana Supreme Court · November 7, 1889 · 121 Ind. 495

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7050167

## Case

- **Full name:** The State, ex rel. Worrell v. Peelle
- **Court:** Indiana Supreme Court
- **Decided:** November 7, 1889
- **Citations:** 121 Ind. 495; 22 N.E. 654; 1889 Ind. LEXIS 75
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Elliott
- **Judges:** Elliott, Olds
- **Cited by:** 14 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7050167

## Opinion text

Dissenting Opinion.
Elliott, C. J.
— I dissent from the prevailing opinion, for the reason that I believe that the Legislature has power to *512 establish a bureau of statistics, and that, having the power to do this, it has, also, the right to select the means and agencies which it deems necessary to carry into effect the law it has enacted establishing that bureau. I have stated my views in the opinion in the case of State, ex rel., v. Hyde, ante, p. 20, and I do not deem it necessary to again discuss the question.
Filed Nov. 7, 1889.
Mitchell, J., concurs with Elliott, C. J.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7050167. Public record. Not legal advice.