# Wolocko v. Town of Ridgefield

> Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · March 16, 2001 · 5 F. App'x 78

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7027809

## Case

- **Full name:** Vivian WOLOCKO v. The TOWN OF RIDGEFIELD, Abraham Morelli, Individually and as a Member of the Board of Selectmen of the Town of Ridgefield, Peter Yanity, Individually and as a Member of the Board of Selectmen of the Town of Ridgefield, Joseph Sevino, Individually and as a Member of the Board of Selectmen of the Town of Ridgefield, Barbara Manners, Individually and as a Member of the Board of Selectmen of the Town of Ridgefield, and Michael Jones, Individually and as a Member of the Board of Selectmen of the Town of Ridgefield, Chad Cohen, Kirsten Cohen, and John Katz, Individually and as a Member of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Ridgefield
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- **Decided:** March 16, 2001
- **Citations:** 5 F. App'x 78
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Jacobs, Jones, Katzmann
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7027809

## Opinion text

SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.
Vivian Wolocko appeals Judge Squatrito’s order granting defendants’ motions for summary judgment, denying Wolocko’s motion for partial summary judgment, and dismissing Wolocko’s claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. See Wolocko v. Town of Ridgefield, No. 98-1096, 2000 WL 565447 (D.Conn. March 31, 2000). We do not reach the issue of whether the district court properly dismissed Wolocko’s § 1985 claim, because she did not raise this issue on appeal. See United States v. Quiroz, 22 F.3d 489, 490 (2d Cir.1994) (“It is well established that an argument not raised on appeal is deemed abandoned”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7027809. Public record. Not legal advice.