# Anthony Atkins v. Ms. Brown Warden Taylor

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · August 18, 1995 · 64 F.3d 655

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/702645

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 18, 1995
- **Citations:** 64 F.3d 655; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 28769; 1995 WL 492992
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/702645

## Opinion text

64 F.3d 655
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Anthony ATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ms. BROWN; Warden Taylor, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6732.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 27, 1995.
Decided Aug. 18, 1995.
Anthony Atkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing Appellant's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Atkins v. Brown, No. CA-95-340-R (W.D.Va. Apr. 18, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/702645. Public record. Not legal advice.