# Brown v. McCormick

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · January 12, 2001 · 1 F. App'x 215

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7017788

## Case

- **Full name:** Barbara BROWN v. Patricia A. McCORMICK MCA/Universal Merchandising, Incorporated, a/k/a Universal Studios Consumer Products, Incorporated The Patchwork Place, Incorporated The Greenwich Workshop, Incorporated John Simpkins Marketing and Financial Management Enterprises, Incorporated Universal City Studios, Incorporated Amblin' Entertainment, Incorporated, and Weller/Grossman Productions, Incorporated Home and Garden Television, a/k/a HGTV, a subsidiary of the E.W. Scripps Company, Defendants Barbara Brown v. Patricia A. McCormick MCA/Universal Merchandising, Incorporated, a/k/a Universal Studios Consumer Products, Incorporated The Patchwork Place, Incorporated Marketing and Financial Management Enterprises, Incorporated Universal City Studios, Incorporated Amblin' Entertainment, Incorporated, and The Greenwich Workshop, Incorporated John Simpkins Weller/Grossman Productions, Incorporated Home and Garden Television, a/k/a HGTV, a subsidiary of the E.W. Scripps Company
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 12, 2001
- **Citations:** 1 F. App'x 215
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7017788

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
Barbara Brown appeals the district court’s order of judgment in her copyright infringement action, and the Defendants cross-appeal. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. McCormick, No. CA-96-3450-L (D.Md. Mar. 8, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7017788. Public record. Not legal advice.