# Hason v. Medical Board of California

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · June 26, 2002 · 294 F.3d 1166

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7011781

## Case

- **Full name:** Michael J. HASON, M.D. v. MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA Department of Consumer Affairs, State of California Arlene Adams, the Director of the Department of Consumer Affairs of the State of California Neil Fippin, individually, & as the Manager, Licensing Program of the Medical Board of the State of California Melinda Acosta, individually & as an official of the Medical Board of the State of D.C. No. California Ron Joseph, individually & as Executive Director of the Medical Board of the State of California & as Director of the Department of Consumer Affairs of the State of California Bruce Hasenkamp, individually & as President of the Division of Licensing of the Medical Board of the State of California Ira Lubell, M.D., individually & as President of the Division of Medical Quality of the Medical Board of the State of California Carole H. Hurvitz Anabel A. Imbert Raquel D. Arias, Dr. Klea D. Bertakis, Dr. Jack Bruner, Dr. Daniel Livingston Karen McElliot Alan E. Shumacher, Dr. Kip S. Skidmore, individually & as Member of the Medical Board of the State of California's Division of Medical Quality Thomas A. Joas, Dr. Karen McElliott, individually & as Officer of the Medical Board of the State of California & its Division of Licensing Bernard Alpert, individually & as Officer of the Medical Board of the State of California & its Division of Licensing Michael I. Sidley, individually & as Executive of the Medical Board of the State of California's Division of Licensing Raja Toke, Dr., individually & as Executive of the Medical Board of the State of California's Division of Licensing The State of California & Senior Investigator, Defendants-Appellees Michael J. Hason, M.D. v. Medical Board of the State of California Department of Consumer Affairs, State of California Arlene Adams, the Director of the Department of Consumer Affairs of the State of California Neil Fippin, individually and as the Manager, Licensing Program of the Medical Board of the State of California Melinda Acosta, individually and as an official of the Medical Board of the State of California Ron Joseph, individually and as Executive Director of the Medical Board of the State of California and as Director of the Department of Consumer Affairs of the State of California Bruce Hasenkamp, individually and as President of the Division of Licensing of the Medical Board of the State of California Ira Lubell, M.D., individually and as President of the Division of Medical Quality of the Medical Board of the State of California Carole H. Hurvitz Anabel A. Imbert Raquel D. Arias, M.D. Klea D. Bertakis, M.D. Jack Bruner, M.D. Daniel Livingston Karen McElliott Alan E. Schumacher, M.D. Kip S. Skidmore, individually and as Members of the Medical Board of the State of California's Division of Medical Quality Thomas A. Joas, M.D. Karen McElliott, individually and as Officer of the Medical Board of the State of California and its Division of Licensing Bernard Alpert, individually and as Officer of the Medical Board of the State of California and its Division of Licensing Michael I. Sidley, individually and as Executive of the Medical Board of the State of California's Division of Licensing Raja Toke, M.D., individually and as Executive of the Medical Board of the State of California's Division of Licensing The State of California Senior Investigator Medical Board of California
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 26, 2002
- **Citations:** 294 F.3d 1166; 2002 WL 1371054
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Goodwin, Kleinfeld, Kozinski, Nelson, Scannlain, Thomas, Wallace, Whom
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7011781

## Opinion text

ORDER
Judge Thomas has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Goodwin and Wallace recommended denial.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7011781. Public record. Not legal advice.