# United States v. Rodney Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · July 10, 1995 · 60 F.3d 825

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/700073

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 10, 1995
- **Citations:** 60 F.3d 825; 1995 WL 404830
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/700073

## Opinion text

60 F.3d 825
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Rodney BROWN, Defendant--Appellant.
No. 94-6684.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 25, 1995.
Decided: July 10, 1995.
Rodney Brown, appellant pro se. Robert William Jaspen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, VA, for appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brown, No. CR-90-113-R (E.D. Va. June 13, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
2
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/700073. Public record. Not legal advice.