# Roberts v. County Com'rs of Cecil County

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 30, 1995 · 60 F.3d 824

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/700051

## Case

- **Full name:** Robert Darnell Roberts v. County Commissioners of Cecil County Kennedy, Sheriff of Cecil County Lough, Chief Jeffery Clewer, Director of Corrections Administration of Cecil County Francis X. Equale, Deputy Brown, Corporal
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 30, 1995
- **Citations:** 60 F.3d 824; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24898; 1995 WL 386794
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/700051

## Opinion text

60 F.3d 824
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Darnell ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CECIL COUNTY; Kennedy, Sheriff of
Cecil County; Lough, Chief; Jeffery Clewer, Director of
Corrections; Administration Of CECIL COUNTY; Francis X.
Equale, Deputy; Brown, Corporal, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6578.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 16, 1995
Decided: June 30, 1995
Robert Darnell Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Karp, Allen, Johnson, Alexander & Karp, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Because there are no complex or substantial issues presented in this appeal, we deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Roberts v. County Commissioners, No. CA-93-273-S (D. Md. Apr. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/700051. Public record. Not legal advice.