# William T. Holmes v. Clarence L. Jackson, Jr. Lewis W. Hurst John A. Brown Gail Y. Browne Jacqueline F. Fraser John B. Metzger, III

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 29, 1995 · 60 F.3d 822

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/699993

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 29, 1995
- **Citations:** 60 F.3d 822; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24866
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/699993

## Opinion text

60 F.3d 822
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William T. HOLMES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Clarence L. JACKSON, Jr.; Lewis W. Hurst; John A. Brown;
Gail Y. Browne; Jacqueline F. Fraser; John B.
Metzger, III, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6586.
No. 95-6562
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 18, 1995
Decided June 29, 1995
William T. Holmes, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals from the district court's * orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's orders, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holmes v. Jackson, No. CA-94-529-R (E.D. Va. Mar. 15, 1995, Apr. 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Jurisdiction was appropriate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 (c) (1988)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/699993. Public record. Not legal advice.