# Brown v. Morris

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · July 6, 1995 · 60 F.3d 820

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/699933

## Case

- **Full name:** Denrick Eric Brown v. Edward C. Morris William P. Roger David A. Williams D.R. Guillory Laurel A. Corner, Operations Manager Joseph Edmond, Adjustment Committee B.L. Collins, Grievance Counsel
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 6, 1995
- **Citations:** 60 F.3d 820; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24748; 1995 WL 417922
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/699933

## Opinion text

60 F.3d 820
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Denrick Eric BROWN, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Edward C. MORRIS; William P. Roger; David A. Williams;
D.R. Guillory; Laurel A. Corner, Operations Manager;
Joseph Edmond, Adjustment Committee; B.L. Collins,
Grievance Counsel, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 94-6947.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 28, 1995.
Decided: July 6, 1995.
Denrick Eric Brown, appellant pro se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Morris, No. CA-92-1192 (E.D.Va. Aug. 4, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
2
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/699933. Public record. Not legal advice.