# Homer Anderson v. Clinchfield Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · July 6, 1995 · 60 F.3d 820

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/699918

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 6, 1995
- **Citations:** 60 F.3d 820; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24739; 1995 WL 418965
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/699918

## Opinion text

60 F.3d 820
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Homer ANDERSON, Petitioner,
v.
CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, United States Department of
Labor, Respondents.
No. 94-1618.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 17, 1995.
Decided: July 6, 1995.
Homer Anderson, petitioner pro se. Timothy Ward Gresham, Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones, Abingdon, VA; Patricia May Nece, Dorothy L. Page, United States Department of Labor, Washington, DC, for respondents.
Ben.Rev.Bd.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1994). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Anderson v. Clinchfield Coal Co., No. 93-0811-BLA (B.R.B. Apr. 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
2
AFFIRMED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/699918. Public record. Not legal advice.