# Brown v. Lehigh & Franklin Coal Co.

> Appellate Court of Illinois · June 2, 1891 · 40 Ill. App. 602

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6992939

## Case

- **Full name:** H. E. Brown v. The Lehigh & Franklin Coal Company
- **Court:** Appellate Court of Illinois
- **Decided:** June 2, 1891
- **Citations:** 40 Ill. App. 602; 1891 Ill. App. LEXIS 46
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Moran
- **Judges:** Moran
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6992939

## Opinion text

Moran, P. J. This is an appeal from a judgment rendered against appellant for coal alleged to have been purchased by him from appellee.
The case was submitted to the court for trial without a jury and no proposition of law was submitted to the court to hold.
The question here presented is wholly one of fact, therefore, and relates to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding. There is evidence in the record which tends to support the finding, and whether that which appears is sufficient to warrant it or not, we must sustain it because the bill of exceptions does not purport to contain all the evidence that was before the trial court, and in such case it will be presumed on review that the evidence before the court was sufficient to warrant the finding. James v. Dexter, 113 Ill. 656 .
The judgment must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6992939. Public record. Not legal advice.