# Carl Barley v. Keith W. Brown Officer Adams Officer Woodward, and Keith Osborne

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 26, 1995 · 59 F.3d 165

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/698784

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 26, 1995
- **Citations:** 59 F.3d 165; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23220; 1995 WL 376167
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/698784

## Opinion text

59 F.3d 165
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Carl BARLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Keith W. BROWN; Officer Adams; Officer Woodward,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
Keith OSBORNE, Defendant.
No. 95-6345.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 26, 1995.
Carl Barley, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Christine Maggard, Lance Bradford Leggitt, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Barley v. Osborne, No. CA-93-484-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 13, 1994 & Feb. 16, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/698784. Public record. Not legal advice.