# Muhaimen Abdeljaber, A/K/A Emad Abdel-Jeper v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 9, 1995 · 57 F.3d 1065

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/697893

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 9, 1995
- **Citations:** 57 F.3d 1065; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21800
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/697893

## Opinion text

57 F.3d 1065
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Muhaimen ABDELJABER, a/k/a Emad Abdel-Jeper, Petitioner,
v.
U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 94-2540.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 28, 1995.
Decided: June 9, 1995.
Muhaimen Abdeljaber, Petitioner Pro Se. Richard Michael Evans, Anthony Wray Norwood, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (Board) decision and order affirming the immigration judge's denial of his application for waiver of deportation. See 8 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1182 (c) (West Supp.1995). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Abdeljaber v. INS, No. Adq-deq-gsi (B.I.A. Sept. 30, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/697893. Public record. Not legal advice.
