# Hadix v. Johnson

> Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · April 17, 1998 · 143 F.3d 246

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6967999

## Case

- **Full name:** Everett HADIX (96-2567/2568) Mary Glover (96-2586/2588 97-1218/1272), Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants v. Perry M. JOHNSON, Director, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 17, 1998
- **Citations:** 143 F.3d 246
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Jones
- **Judges:** Jones, Kennedy, Suhrheinrich
- **Cited by:** 25 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- **Red flag:** Reversed in part, on other grounds by Martin v. Hadix, 527 U.S. 343 (1999).
- Negative treatments: 1
- Distinguished by: 0
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6967999

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- describing facts of Glover

## Opinion text

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge,
concurring.
I generally concur in the majority’s well drafted opinion. However, I write separately to express my disagreement with the majority’s reversal of the district court’s award of attorney’s fees for work in the parental rights appeal, No. 96-1617, and the subsequent petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court. Athough the plaintiffs w'ere not ultimately successful in the appeal. I feel that this work, along with all of the other work *260 plaintiffs’ counsel performed in this case, was compensable post-judgment compliance monitoring and related to the underlying equal protection and access to court claims upon which plaintiffs prevailed in their original action. I would therefore affirm all of the fee awards in this case.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6967999. Public record. Not legal advice.