# Timothy Lamont Williams v. Dan R. Lawson, Warden Jim Beale, Assistant Warden C. Irving, Lieutenant Wayne Brown, Operations Officer

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 25, 1995 · 56 F.3d 63

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/696771

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 25, 1995
- **Citations:** 56 F.3d 63; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19161; 1995 WL 318448
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/696771

## Opinion text

56 F.3d 63
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Timothy Lamont WILLIAMS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Dan R. LAWSON, Warden; Jim Beale, Assistant Warden; C.
Irving, Lieutenant; Wayne Brown, Operations
Officer, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-6184.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 20, 1995
Decided May 25, 1995
Timothy Lamont Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Lawson, No. CA-94-1455 (E.D. Va. Dec. 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/696771. Public record. Not legal advice.