# Payne v. Jackson

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 20, 1995 · 56 F.3d 61

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/696707

## Case

- **Full name:** Harold Payne v. Rick Jackson, Superintendent of Brown Creek Correctional Center Franklin Freeman, Secretary of Corrections James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 20, 1995
- **Citations:** 56 F.3d 61; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19109
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/696707

## Opinion text

56 F.3d 61
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Harold PAYNE, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Rick JACKSON, Superintendent of Brown Creek Correctional
Center; Franklin Freeman, Secretary of
Corrections; James B. Hunt, Jr.,
Governor, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-6298.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 20, 1995
Harold Payne, Appellant Pro Se. Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint alleging that he was assaulted by a fellow inmate. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Because Appellant has not established that Appellees knew the assaulting inmate presented a specific, known risk of harm to Appellant, the Appellees are not liable under Sec. 1983. Moore v. Winebrenner, 927 F.2d 1312 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 828 (1991). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment for Appellees. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/696707. Public record. Not legal advice.