# Victor E. Brown v. Virginia Department of Corrections

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 31, 1995 · 56 F.3d 60

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/696689

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 31, 1995
- **Citations:** 56 F.3d 60; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19068; 1995 WL 323863
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/696689

## Opinion text

56 F.3d 60
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Victor E. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 95-6328.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: May 31, 1995.
Victor E. Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Virginia Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-95-106-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/696689. Public record. Not legal advice.