# Gold v. City of Miami

> Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · April 7, 1998 · 138 F.3d 886

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6964951

## Case

- **Full name:** Michael C. GOLD v. CITY OF MIAMI, a Florida Municipal Corporation, Calvin Ross, individually, Rafael Suarez, individually, Jorge Perez, individually, William Campbell, individually
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
- **Decided:** April 7, 1998
- **Citations:** 138 F.3d 886; 1998 WL 158495
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Anderson, Barkett, Birch, Black, Carnes, Cox, Dubina, Edmondson, Hatchett, Hull, Marcus, Tjoflat
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6964951

## Opinion text

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
(Opinion Sept. 17,1997,11th Cir., 121 F.3d 1442 ).
Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), rehearing en banc is DENIED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6964951. Public record. Not legal advice.