# Harkness v. SAIf Corp.

> Court of Appeals of Oregon · December 6, 2000 · 171 Or. App. 329

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6944102

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of the Compensation of John Harkness, John HARKNESS v. SAIF CORPORATION and Unocal 76
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Oregon
- **Decided:** December 6, 2000
- **Citations:** 171 Or. App. 329; 15 P.3d 103; 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 2001
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Deits, Edmonds, Kistler
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6944102

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM
This is a workers’ compensation case in which claimant seeks review of the order of the Workers’ Compensation Board upholding SAIF’s denial of compensation. He contends that the Board erred in affirming SAIF’s denial of coverage because its denial was premature under our holding in Croman Corp. v. Serrano, 163 Or App 136 , 986 P2d 1253 (1999). Because the Board did not make a finding as to whether acceptance occurred before the denial in question, we remand for reconsideration. Blamires v. Clean Pak Systems, Inc., 171 Or App 263 , 15 P3d 101 (2000).
Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6944102. Public record. Not legal advice.