# Johnson v. Civil Service Board

> Court of Appeals of Oregon · September 15, 1999 · 162 Or. App. 527

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6943705

## Case

- **Full name:** Daryl JOHNSON v. CIVIL SERVICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF PORTLAND, Portland Parks and Recreation Bureau, and City of Portland
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Oregon
- **Decided:** September 15, 1999
- **Citations:** 162 Or. App. 527; 986 P.2d 666; 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1576
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Haselton
- **Judges:** Haselton, Linder, Muniz
- **Cited by:** 13 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6943705

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- applying Reguero factors; concluding that police officer’s hearsay testimony recounting accusations of public indecency did not constitute substantial evidence that the petitioner had, in fact, engaged in such conduct

## Opinion text

HASELTON, J.
Appellant has moved to “clarify” our disposition because “[i]t seems the parties are unable to agree on what the Court of Appeals intended to happen next.” We allow the motion. Our disposition “Reversed and remanded,” Johnson v. Civil Service Board, 161 Or App 489, 506 , 985 P2d 854 (1999), is clarified and modified to read: “Reversed and remanded with instructions to issue writ reversing decision of Civil Service Board and determining petitioner’s entitlement to ancillary relief, including reinstatement and restitution, pursuant to ORS 34.100.”
Motion granted; disposition modified to read: “Reversed and remanded with instructions to issue writ reversing decision of Civil Service Board and determining petitioner’s entitlement to ancillary relief, including reinstatement and restitution, pursuant to ORS 34.100.”; otherwise adhered to.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6943705. Public record. Not legal advice.