# Marshall v. SAIF Corp.

> Court of Appeals of Oregon · January 29, 1997 · 146 Or. App. 50

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6942761

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of the Compensation of Deana F. Marshall, Deana F. MARSHALL v. SAIF CORPORATION
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Oregon
- **Decided:** January 29, 1997
- **Citations:** 146 Or. App. 50; 931 P.2d 823; 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 70
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Armstrong
- **Judges:** Armstrong, Landau, Leeson, Riggs
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6942761

## Opinion text

ARMSTRONG, J.,
concurring.
I join the majority because I agree with it that the Board erred in concluding that claimant had failed to submit corroborative evidence on her claim. I disagree, however, with its conclusion that the corroboration requirement in ORS 656.128(3) is satisfied if corroborative evidence is submitted on either element of the test for whether an injury or disease is work related. I agree with the dissent that the statute requires corroborative evidence to be submitted on both elements of the test.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6942761. Public record. Not legal advice.