# Garratt v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

> Court of Appeals of Oregon · December 11, 1996 · 145 Or. App. 254

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6942724

## Case

- **Full name:** STEVEN D. GARRATT v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Oregon
- **Decided:** December 11, 1996
- **Citations:** 145 Or. App. 254; 927 P.2d 1121; 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1849
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Deits, Hasel, Muniz, Ton
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6942724

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision establishing conditions of parole, including a declaration that petitioner is a predatory sex offender. ORS 181.585 to ORS 181.589.
Most of Petitioner’s arguments are resolved contrary to his position by our decisions in Schuch v. Board of Parole, 139 Or App 327 , 912 P2d 403 , rev den 324 Or 78 (1996), and Gress v. Board of Parole, 143 Or App 7 , 924 P2d 329 , on recons 144 Or App 375 , 927 P2d 138 (1996). Petitioner also argues that the Board erred in including as a condition of his parole that he not have contact with minor males without prior written approval of his parole officer and that he not have any contact with his ex-wife and her family. Petitioner’s argument is without merit and does not require discussion.
Affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6942724. Public record. Not legal advice.