# Lane v. SAIF Corp.

> Court of Appeals of Oregon · January 4, 1995 · 132 Or. App. 371

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6941820

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of the Complying Status of Dan J. and Giselle Dana Lane, and In the Matter of the Compensation of Marshall K. Birdwell, Dan J. LANE and Giselle Dana Lane v. SAIF CORPORATION, Department of Insurance and Finance and Marshall K. Birdwell
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Oregon
- **Decided:** January 4, 1995
- **Citations:** 132 Or. App. 371; 887 P.2d 393; 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 11
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Leeson, Muniz, Richardson
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6941820

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM
In this workers’ compensation case, the Board determined that petitioners were noncomplying employers and upheld SAIF’s acceptance of claimant’s head and back injury on behalf of petitioners. The Board did not have the benefit of the Supreme Court’s opinion in S-W Floor Cover Shop v. Natl. Council on Comp. Ins., 318 Or 614 , 872 P2d 1 (1994), when it issued its order.
SAIF concedes that the Board applied the wrong legal standard and that the case must be remanded to the Board to determine whether petitioners were noncomplying employers with respect to claimant. We accept that concession.
Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6941820. Public record. Not legal advice.