# Akers v. Board of Parole

> Court of Appeals of Oregon · February 2, 1994 · 126 Or. App. 265

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6941286

## Case

- **Full name:** ERIC MICHAEL AKERS v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Oregon
- **Decided:** February 2, 1994
- **Citations:** 126 Or. App. 265; 866 P.2d 527; 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 112
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Durham, Edmonds, Tempore, Warren
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6941286

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision that imposed as a condition of parole that he not have contact with a particular person. He asserts that there is not substantial evidence to support imposition of the condition. We have reviewed the record, including evidence not disclosed to petitioner, and conclude that there is evidence justifying the imposition of the condition. He also challenges the refusal of the Board to disclose to him a letter it considered in imposing the condition. The withholding of the letter was not error. Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331 , 862 P2d 1312 (1993).
Affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6941286. Public record. Not legal advice.