# Contractors Ass'n of Eastern Pennsylvania, Inc. v. City of Philadelphia

> Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · September 5, 1996 · 91 F.3d 586

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6940808

## Case

- **Full name:** CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, INC. General Building Contractors Association, Inc. Associated Master Painters & Decorators of Philadelphia, Inc. Employing Bricklayers Association of Delaware Valley, Inc. Interior Finish Contractors Association, Inc. Mechanical Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania, Inc. Roofing and Sheet Metal Contractors Association, Inc. Sub-Contractors Association of Delaware Valley, Inc. National Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA Elizabeth Reveal, as Director of Finance for the City of Philadelphia Curtis Jones, Jr., as Director of the Minority Business Enterprise Council United Minority Enterprise Associates, Inc.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- **Decided:** September 5, 1996
- **Citations:** 91 F.3d 586
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Alito, Becker, Cowen, Greenberg, Lewis, Mansmann, McKee, Nygaard, Rosenn, Roth, Sarokin, Scirica, Sloviter, Stapleton
- **Cited by:** 26 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6940808

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that “it is appropriate to consider any evidence, pre- or post-enactment, relevant to the issue of whether such discrimination, or the effects thereof, existed prior to 1982 [the date the challenged ordinance was first enacted]”

## Opinion text

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
Sept. 5, 1996
The petition for rehearing filed by appellants in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6940808. Public record. Not legal advice.