# Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Holden

> Court of Appeals of Oregon · September 30, 1992 · 115 Or. App. 390

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6940069

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of the Compensation of Dale E. Holden, HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY v. Dale E. HOLDEN
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Oregon
- **Decided:** September 30, 1992
- **Citations:** 115 Or. App. 390; 838 P.2d 643; 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1759
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Buttler, Muniz, Rossman
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6940069

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM
In this workers’ compensation case, employer seeks review of an order of the Board affirming the referee’s decision to allow claimant’s claim for a knee injury. Employer argues that the Board erred in finding that the cause of the injury was work-related and in determining that the claim was supported by objective medical findings. ORS 656.005(7)(a), (19).
Substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that the knee injury was work-related. Additionally, the Board found that claimant’s doctor noted claimant’s subjective complaints of sharp pain, a catching sensation, particularly with twisting motions and, also, “notable patellar crepitus” in response to motion and internal rotation. The doctor’s report constitutes objective findings. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Ferrer, 114 Or App 471 , 835 P2d 949 (1992).
Employer’s remaining argument does not require discussion.
Affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6940069. Public record. Not legal advice.