# Brown v. Guillory

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 12, 1995 · 52 F.3d 320

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/693733

## Case

- **Full name:** Denrick Eric Brown v. Don R. Guillory, Warden L.W. Jarvis, Assistant Warden C.N. Lewis, Chief of Security Correctional Lieutenant J. R. S.B. Quick, Correctional Officer
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 12, 1995
- **Citations:** 52 F.3d 320; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17213; 1995 WL 215451
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/693733

## Opinion text

52 F.3d 320
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Denrick Eric BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Don R. GUILLORY, Warden; L.W. Jarvis, Assistant Warden;
C.N. Lewis, Chief of Security; Correctional
Lieutenant J. R.; S.B. Quick,
Correctional Officer,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6163.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 15, 1995.
Decided: April 12, 1995.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-94-1054-AM)
Denrick Eric Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
2
DISMISSED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/693733. Public record. Not legal advice.