# AT & T v. National Labor Relations Board

> Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · September 29, 1995 · 67 F.3d 446

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6936442

## Case

- **Full name:** AT & T, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. EXECUTIVE CLEANING SERVICES, INC. and Thru State Maintenance, Inc., International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 68, AFL-CIO, Intervenor
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- **Decided:** September 29, 1995
- **Citations:** 67 F.3d 446
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Mahoney, Oakes, Winter
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6936442

## Opinion text

ORDER ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Sept. 29, 1995
The petition for rehearing filed by the National Labor Relations Board called to the panel’s attention that neither Executive Cleaning Services, Inc. nor Thru State Maintenance, Inc., Respondents, had petitioned for review of the NLRB order and that the cases had been consolidated wherein the Board was petitioning for enforcement. In granting the petition of AT & T for review and denying the Board’s application for enforcement against it, the panel in no way intended to deny the Board’s petition for enforcement against Executive Cleaning Services, Inc. and Thru State Maintenance, Inc., both of which had not even filed exceptions to the administrative law judge’s decision, much less a motion for reconsideration of the Board’s decision and order reported at 315 NLRB 227 , 1994 WL 549297 (1994), or an answer to the application of the Board for enforcement, or a brief on appeal. So that the matter will be clarified as to the petition of the Board for enforcement against Respondents Executive Cleaning Services, Inc. and Thru State Maintenance, Inc.,
It is Ordered that the petition for enforcement against said Respondents be and it hereby is granted.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6936442. Public record. Not legal advice.