# Lucas v. Clark

> Court of Appeals of Oregon · June 15, 1988 · 91 Or. App. 522

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6936180

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of the Compensation of Edward D. Lucas, LUCAS v. CLARK
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Oregon
- **Decided:** June 15, 1988
- **Citations:** 91 Or. App. 522; 756 P.2d 57
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Graber, Riggs, Tempore
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6936180

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM
Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that affirmed the referee and upheld the denial of his aggravation claim for a back condition. We review for substantial evidence. ORS 656.298(6); ORS 183.482(7) and (8). Because neither the Board order nor the referee’s opinion and order which it affirmed are adequate for judicial review, see Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200 , 752 P2d 312 (1988), we remand to the Board for reconsideration. On remand, the Board also should reconsider this case in the light of Gwynn v. SAIF, 304 Or 345 , 745 P2d 775 (1987), on remand 91 Or App 84 , 754 P2d 586 (1988), and International Paper Co. v. Turner, 304 Or 354 , 745 P2d 780 (1987), on remand 91 Or App 91 , 754 P2d 589 (1988).
Remanded for reconsideration.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6936180. Public record. Not legal advice.