# Greate Bay Hotel & Casino v. Tose

> Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · September 6, 1994 · 34 F.3d 1227

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6932116

## Case

- **Full name:** GREATE BAY HOTEL & CASINO, d/b/a Sands Hotel, Casino & Country Club v. Leonard H. TOSE, Appellant GREATE BAY HOTEL & CASINO, d/b/a Sands Hotel, Casino & Country Club v. Leonard H. TOSE, Greate Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- **Decided:** September 6, 1994
- **Citations:** 34 F.3d 1227
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Alito, Atkins, Cowen, Greenberg, Hutchinson, Lewis, Mansmann, McKee, Nygaard, Roth, Sloviter, Stapleton
- **Cited by:** 36 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6932116

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that the Casino Control Act did not vest the CCC with exclusive primary jurisdiction over a gambler's claims against a casino for his losses
- holding that decision to allow use of witnesses or exhibits not previously identified is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard

## Opinion text

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
Oct. 19, 1994
The petition for rehearing filed by the appellant-cross-appellee Leonard H. Tose, in the above captioned matter having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and to all the other available circuit judges of the court in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6932116. Public record. Not legal advice.