# Yeager's Fuel, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.

> Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · June 6, 1994 · 22 F.3d 1260

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6930565

## Case

- **Full name:** YEAGER'S FUEL, INC. Atlantic Oil and Heating Company Mansfeld Fuel Oil Company Deiter Brothers Fuel Company, Inc. Ralph D. Weaver, Inc. C.A. Lessig, Inc. Harned Durham Oil Company, Inc. Schwanger Brothers & Company, Inc. SICO Company Withlock & Woerth, Inc. Zongora Fuel, Inc. Senick, Inc. Carlos R. Leffler, Inc. H. John Davis, Inc. Arthur J. Ulrich, Inc. Union Fuel Company Guy Heavener, Inc. Desousa Oil and Service Corp. W.C. Reichenbach & Sons, Inc. Apgar Oil Company, Inc. Freyman's Fuel Oil Company, Inc. v. PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY LOSCH BOILER SALES AND SERVICE CO., Individually and on Behalf of All Persons Similarly Situated v. PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO., Yeager's Fuel, Inc. Atlantic Oil and Heating Company Mansfeld Fuel Oil Company Deiter Brothers Fuel Company, Inc. Ralph D. Weaver, Inc. C.A. Lessig, Inc. Harned Durham Oil Company Schwanger Brothers and Company, Inc. SICO Company Whitlock & Woerth, Inc. Zongora Fuel, Inc. Senick, Inc. Carlos R. Leffler, Inc. H. John Davis, Inc. Arthur J. Ulrich, Inc. Union Fuel Company Guy Heavener, Inc. Desousa Oil and Service Corp. W.C. Reichenbach & Sons, Inc. Apgar Oil Company, Inc. and Freyman's Fuel Oil Company, Inc. and Losch Boiler Sales & Service Co., individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- **Decided:** June 6, 1994
- **Citations:** 22 F.3d 1260; 1994 WL 145701
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Greenberg, Lewis, Mansmann
- **Cited by:** 17 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6930565

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that even though the ALJ provided “a relatively 23 detailed overview of claimant’s medical history, providing a summary of medical evidence 24 ... is not the same as providing clear and convincing reasons for finding the claimant's 25 symptom testimony not credible”
- holding that district courts retain authority to issue 23 certificates of appealability under AEDPA

## Opinion text

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
June 6, 1994
PRESENT: MANSMANN, GREENBERG and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.
The petition for panel rehearing filed by the appellants in the above entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6930565. Public record. Not legal advice.