# Hens v. Employment Division

> Court of Appeals of Oregon · December 1, 1982 · 60 Or. App. 419

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6930321

## Case

- **Full name:** HENS v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Oregon
- **Decided:** December 1, 1982
- **Citations:** 60 Or. App. 419; 653 P.2d 1301; 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 4131
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Hoomissen
- **Judges:** Hoomissen, Richardson, Thornton
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6930321

## Opinion text

VAN HOOMISSEN, J.,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent. I would hold that the facts found by the Board do not support the conclusion that claimant had received a guaranteed wage. Therefore, he was not disqualified. See Gollender v. Morgan, 17 Or App 104 , 520 P2d 453 (1974).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6930321. Public record. Not legal advice.