# United States v. Price

> Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · March 11, 1994 · 13 F.3d 711

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6929374

## Case

- **Full name:** United States v. James PRICE, a/k/a "Squeezie," James Price, Appellant UNITED STATES of America v. Reginald REAVES, a/k/a "Reggie," a/k/a "R," Reginald Reaves, Appellant UNITED STATES of America v. Joseph COBB, a/k/a "Gump," Appellant UNITED STATES of America v. Leroy JACKSON, a/k/a "Skip," Leroy Jackson, Appellant UNITED STATES of America v. Darrell REAVES, Appellant UNITED STATES of America v. Anthony LONG, a/k/a "T.L.," a/k/a "Tony," Anthony Long, Appellant UNITED STATES of America v. Michael WILLIAMS
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- **Decided:** March 11, 1994
- **Citations:** 13 F.3d 711; 1994 WL 3789
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Greenberg, Roth, Sloviter
- **Cited by:** 154 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6929374

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- concluding that there was sufficient reason, independent of character, for the admission of evidence that defendant was previously arrested for possession of a gun because the prior gun incident took place during the span of a drug conspiracy and the indictment charged that me…
- stating that Reaves’ criminal organization “distributed in the Philadelphia area over 1,000 kilograms of cocaine” and that “[o]ver 564.5 kilograms of cocaine can be attributed to” Reaves’ brother, Darrell, who was “involved in distributing drugs in his brother’s squad, and was…
- concluding that an erroneous jury instruction was not harmless regarding one defendant because the evidence, “albeit sufficient, was not overwhelming,” and noting defendant’s acquittal on the substantive charge in considering the strength of the evidence supporting a defendant…
- finding harmless the erroneous denial of a motion to suppress fourteen kilograms of cocaine in light of the testimony of several witnesses that appellant delivered cocaine for distribution, wore a ring associated with a drug-trafficking organization, and worked with members of…
- finding no reversible error where “there [was] no suggestion ... that the judge inappropriately participated in the questioning of witnesses” and where “the judge charged the jury that they were not to rely on their perception of his beliefs.”

## Opinion text

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
(No. 93-1069)
February 4, 1994
Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.
The petition for rehearing filed by Appellant Leroy Jackson in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied. Judge Becker would grant rehearing.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6929374. Public record. Not legal advice.