# Serbin v. Ziebart International Corp.

> Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · November 30, 1993 · 11 F.3d 1163

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6929143

## Case

- **Full name:** Sara G. SERBIN and George Baker, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. ZIEBART INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, INC. and Ziebart Corporation, Appellees Sheilah GUARINO v. SUN COMPANY, INC., Sun Refining & Marketing Company, Robert McClements, Jr., David Zebley and Wells, Rich, and Greene, Inc.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- **Decided:** November 30, 1993
- **Citations:** 11 F.3d 1163; 1993 WL 490869
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Alito, Becker, Cowen, Greenberg, Hutchinson, Lewis, Mansmann, Nygaard, Pollak, Roth, Scirica, Sloviter, Stapleton
- **Cited by:** 54 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6929143

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- finding the ALJ did not err in his RFC finding and rejecting a 12 claimant’s challenge to an ALJ’s step five analysis on the basis that the vocational expert’s 13 testimony was not based on an incomplete hypothetical posed by the ALJ
- affirming dismissal with prejudice of prolix, argumentative, and 12 redundant amended Complaint that did not comply with Rule 8(a)

## Opinion text

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
Dec. 29, 1993.
The petition for rehearing filed by appellant in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated- in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6929143. Public record. Not legal advice.