# Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission

> Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · October 17, 1963 · 329 F.2d 223

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6926548

## Case

- **Full name:** TEXACO, INC. v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent TEXACO, INC. v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Intervenor SUN OIL COMPANY v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Intervenor
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- **Decided:** October 17, 1963
- **Citations:** 329 F.2d 223; 51 P.U.R.3d 70
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Fahy
- **Judges:** Burger, Fahy, Prettyman
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6926548

## Opinion text

FAHY, Circuit Judge
(concurs in the result).
I agree that Section 19(b) of the Natural Gas Act does not authorize this court to review evidentiary rulings of the Commission in an interlocutory manner independent of the provisions of that section governing the jurisdiction of this court. Cf. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Federal Power Commission et al., 116 U.S.App.D.C. 249 , 322 F.2d 999 (1963). I do not read Consolidated Edison Co. v. N.L.R.B., 305 U.S. 197 , 59 S.Ct. *229 206 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938), decided under the provisions governing review of orders of the Labor Board, as in any manner inconsistent with this position.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6926548. Public record. Not legal advice.