# Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, Virginia

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 10, 1963 · 317 F.2d 429

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6925061

## Case

- **Full name:** Minerva BRADLEY, I. A. Jackson, Jr., Rosa Lee Quarles, John Edward Johnson, Elihu C. Myers and Elizabeth S. Myers v. The SCHOOL BOARD of the CITY OF RICHMOND, VIRGINIA, H. I. Willet, Division Superintendent of Schools of the City of Richmond, Virginia, and E. J. Oglesby, Alfred L. Wingo and E. T. Justis, individually and constituting the Pupil Placement Board of the Commonwealth of Virginia
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 10, 1963
- **Citations:** 317 F.2d 429
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Bryan
- **Judges:** Boreman, Bryan
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6925061

## Opinion text

ALBERT V. BRYAN, Circuit Judge
(dissenting in part).
I see no need for the prospective injunction. With fairness and clarity the opinion of the Court comprehensively discusses and approves the course the District Court prescribed for the de *439 iendants to follow in the future. With no reason to believe his directions will not be respected, the District Judge refused the injunction. In this he exercis■ed the discretion generally accorded the trial judge in such situations, especially when the necessity for an injunction must be measured by local conditions. Of these we have no knowledge more intimate than his. I would not add the injunction.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6925061. Public record. Not legal advice.