# Brown v. Cupp

> Court of Appeals of Oregon · August 17, 1977 · 30 Or. App. 647

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6924028

## Case

- **Full name:** DOUG BROWN v. CUPP
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Oregon
- **Decided:** August 17, 1977
- **Citations:** 30 Or. App. 647; 567 P.2d 619; 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1644
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Schwab, Tanzer, Thornton
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6924028

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
In this habeas corpus proceeding, plaintiff, a prisoner in the Oregon State Penitentiary, appeals from the trial court’s finding that he was not mentally ill and therefore was not being denied adequate medical care for his mental illness.
Contrary to plaintiffs contention, the testimony of the prison psychiatrist that the defendant was not mentally ill and did not need psychiatric care is sufficient to support a finding of fact not subject to being disturbed on review. Ball v. Gladden, 250 Or 485 , 443 P2d 621 (1968). 1
Affirmed.
The issue raised by the state in Penrod v. Cupp, 30 Or App 371 , 567 P2d 563 (1977), is not raised here.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6924028. Public record. Not legal advice.