# Guill v. Pendleton Woolen Mills

> Oregon Supreme Court · April 26, 1988 · 305 Or. 538

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6915267

## Case

- **Full name:** In the Matter of the Compensation of Margie M. Guill, GUILL, on Review v. PENDLETON WOOLEN MILLS, on Review
- **Court:** Oregon Supreme Court
- **Decided:** April 26, 1988
- **Citations:** 305 Or. 538; 754 P.2d 574; 1988 Ore. LEXIS 236
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Peterson
- **Judges:** Peterson
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6915267

## Opinion text

PETERSON, C. J.
The claimant prevailed at a hearing before the Workers’ Compensation Board referee in establishing the compensability of her injury claim. Her employer appealed to the board, which affirmed the referee on compensability but reduced the fee that the referee awarded the claimant’s attorney. The claimant seeks review of the Court of Appeals’ decision holding that the board, rather than the circuit court, had jurisdiction to review the referee’s award of attorney fees.
The employer sought review of the referee’s decision. As a result, the claimant did not prevail finally before the referee. The proper forum to review the referee’s fee award was the board. Greenslitt v. City of Lake Oswego, 305 Or 530, 534, 535 , 754 P2d 570 (1988). See also ORS 656.382(2), 656.386(1).
The decisions of the Court of Appeals and the Workers’ Compensation Board are affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6915267. Public record. Not legal advice.