# Schmidt v. Board of Parole

> Oregon Supreme Court · August 4, 1987 · 303 Or. 673

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6915189

## Case

- **Full name:** JAMES PETER SCHMIDT, on review v. BOARD OF PAROLE, on review
- **Court:** Oregon Supreme Court
- **Decided:** August 4, 1987
- **Citations:** 303 Or. 673; 740 P.2d 776; 1987 Ore. LEXIS 1563
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Gillette
- **Judges:** Gillette, Linde
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6915189

## Opinion text

GILLETTE, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
For the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Anderson v. Board of Parole, 303 Or 618, 632 , 740 P2d 760, 769 (1987), I respectfully dissent from that portion of this opinion dealing with a “detailed explanation,” under ORS 144.135, of the action taken by the Board of Parole with respect to the mandatory minimum sentence. I concur with the balance of the opinion.
Linde, J., joins in this concurring and dissenting opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6915189. Public record. Not legal advice.