# Ackerley Communications, Inc. v. Multnomah County

> Oregon Supreme Court · March 31, 1987 · 303 Or. 165

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6915140

## Case

- **Full name:** ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS, INC., on Review v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY, on Review
- **Court:** Oregon Supreme Court
- **Decided:** March 31, 1987
- **Citations:** 303 Or. 165; 734 P.2d 885
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Carson, Lent, Linde
- **Cited by:** 8 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6915140

## Opinion text

*166 MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petitioner on review, Multnomah County, has filed a motion which reads as follows:
“Petitioner herein, Multnomah County, hereby withdraws its Petition for Review as though the same was never filed, and moves the Court to dismiss the Petition without taking any other action. If the Court should refuse to grant this Motion to withdraw Petition and instead proposes to vacate the Court of Appeals Opinion involved herein, petitioner and respondent ask leave to be heard further on that matter.”
Without expressing an opinion on the merits of this case, we dismiss the Petition for Review.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6915140. Public record. Not legal advice.