# 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

> Oregon Supreme Court · August 12, 1986 · 301 Or. 447

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6915063

## Case

- **Full name:** 1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON, on Review v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, on Review
- **Court:** Oregon Supreme Court
- **Decided:** August 12, 1986
- **Citations:** 301 Or. 447; 724 P.2d 268; 1986 Ore. LEXIS 1467
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Peterson
- **Judges:** Lent, Peterson
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6915063

## Opinion text

PETERSON, C. J.,
concurring
I agree that a county must take an exception to Goal 14 in order to authorize an urban use outside a UGB, that the taking of exceptions to Goals 3 and 4 is not equivalent to the taking of an exception to Goal 14, that the county should have taken an exception to Goal 14 in authorizing uses which could be termed “urban uses” outside an existing UGB, and that the case must be remanded for the reasons stated in the majority opinion. I therefore concur in the result.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6915063. Public record. Not legal advice.