# Jarald Wayne Brown v. Betty Erickson Prison Health Services, Incorporated

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 20, 1995 · 50 F.3d 5

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/691496

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 20, 1995
- **Citations:** 50 F.3d 5; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11345; 1995 WL 115887
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/691496

## Opinion text

50 F.3d 5
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jarald Wayne BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Betty ERICKSON; Prison Health Services, Incorporated,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-7275.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 16, 1995
Decided: March 20, 1995
Jarald Wayne Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Kenneth Joseph Barton, Jr., Godard & West, P.C., Fairfax, VA, for Appellee.
Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Erickson, No. CA-93-785 (E.D. Va. Sept. 27, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/691496. Public record. Not legal advice.