# United States v. Arturo Francisco Brown, A/K/A Montana > Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · February 14, 1995 · 47 F.3d 1166 URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/689446 ## Case - **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - **Decided:** February 14, 1995 - **Citations:** 47 F.3d 1166; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11266; 1995 WL 58575 - **Precedential status:** Unpublished - **Opinion:** Opinion - **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library ## Citator (automated) - No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases. - Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/689446 ## Opinion text 47 F.3d 1166 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Arturo Francisco BROWN, a/k/a Montana, Defendant--Appellant. No. 94-6530. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 19, 1995. Decided Feb. 14, 1995. Arturo Francisco Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, NC, for Appellee. Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brown, No. CR-90-196; CA-93-466 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 1994). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * We grant Appellant's motion to file a supplemental appendix and his motion to file an informal brief out of time --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/689446. Public record. Not legal advice.