# Michael Aice v. Louisa D. Brown, Warden Parker Evatt, Commissioner T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · January 4, 1995 · 45 F.3d 425

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/686856

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 4, 1995
- **Citations:** 45 F.3d 425; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5825; 1995 WL 3689
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/686856

## Opinion text

45 F.3d 425
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Michael AICE, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Louisa D. BROWN, Warden; Parker Evatt, Commissioner; T.
Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of
South Carolina, Respondents Appellees.
No. 94-6580.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 25, 1994.
Decided Jan. 4, 1995.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., District Judge. (CA-92-2262)
Michael Aice, appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Columbia, SC, for appellees.
D.S.C.
DISMISSED.
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM
1
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Aice v. Brown, No. CA-92-2262 (D.S.C. Apr. 15, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/686856. Public record. Not legal advice.