# De Leon v. Rhines

> Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · December 3, 1934 · 74 F.2d 477

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6861330

## Case

- **Full name:** DE LEON v. RHINES et ux.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- **Decided:** December 3, 1934
- **Citations:** 74 F.2d 477; 64 App. D.C. 73; 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 3997
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Groner
- **Judges:** Groner, Hitz, Martin, Robb
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6861330

## Opinion text

GRONER, Associate Justice.
I concur on the authority of Wolfe v. Murphy, 47 App. D. C. 296. The doctrine announced there has been accepted as the law in the District of Columbia for more than fifteen years, and to disturb it now would doubtless create more confusion than advantage, but I am constrained to say that if the question were new, I should reach a wholly different conclusion. See Union Ins. Co. v. Hanford, 143 U. S. 187 -190, 12 S. Ct. 437 , 36 L. Ed. 118 .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6861330. Public record. Not legal advice.