# United States v. Bloomingdale Bros. & Co.

> Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 1, 1920 · 10 Ct. Cust. 149

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6828020

## Case

- **Full name:** United States v. Bloomingdale Bros. & Co.
- **Court:** Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
- **Decided:** May 1, 1920
- **Citations:** 10 Ct. Cust. 149; 1920 CCPA LEXIS 32
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Barber
- **Judges:** Barber, Martin, Montgomery, Smith, Yries
- **Cited by:** 37 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6828020

## Opinion text

CONCURRING OPINION.
Barber, Judge:
The importers have established that the classification of the collector was wrong. They have also established that the merchandise is dutiable under paragraph 252. Under the circumstances set forth in the court’s opinion I think the invoice possesses sufficient probative force to-justify the conclusion that the judgment of the Board of General Appraisers should be affirmed, but I query if the invoice possesses probative force to the extent that the opinion might seem to indicate.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6828020. Public record. Not legal advice.