# United States v. Cronkhite Co.

> Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · April 1, 1919 · 9 Ct. Cust. 129

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6827918

## Case

- **Full name:** United States v. Cronkhite Co.
- **Court:** Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
- **Decided:** April 1, 1919
- **Citations:** 9 Ct. Cust. 129; 1919 CCPA LEXIS 23; 1919 WL 21407
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Smith
- **Judges:** Barber, Martin, Montgomery, Smith, Vries
- **Cited by:** 23 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6827918

## Opinion text

DISSENTING OPINION.
Smith, Judge:
For the reasons stated by me in Vandegrift &. Co. v. United States ( 9 Ct. Cust. Appls., 112 ; T. D. 37978; suit No. 1904), I am of the opinion that the decision of the Board of General Appraisers should not be reversed,. but affirmed, and therefore dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6827918. Public record. Not legal advice.