# Oceanic Trading Co. v. United States

> Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · May 22, 1933 · 21 C.C.P.A. 146

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6813579

## Case

- **Full name:** Oceanic Trading Co. v. United States
- **Court:** Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
- **Decided:** May 22, 1933
- **Citations:** 21 C.C.P.A. 146; 1933 CCPA LEXIS 185
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Bland
- **Judges:** Bland, Garrett, Graham, Hatfield, Lenroot
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6813579

## Opinion text

CONCURRING OPINION
Bland, Judge,
specially concurring: I concur in the conclusion of the majority only because it is my understanding that the reversal of the judgment of the court below and the remand are not intended as ruling that the United States Customs Court, in an appraisement case, is required, under the statute, to give any weight or consideration to an affidavit, such as is discussed in the opinion, and I agree in the reversal because a remand may bring about a fuller and more definite explanation of the attitude of the court below on this important question.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6813579. Public record. Not legal advice.