# Ross v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

> Ohio Supreme Court · August 28, 2015 · 146 Ohio St. 3d 12

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6798982

## Case

- **Full name:** Ross v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** August 28, 2015
- **Citations:** 146 Ohio St. 3d 12; 2015 Ohio 3443; 51 N.E.3d 578
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Connor, Donnell, French, Kennedy, Lanzinger, Neill, Pfeifer
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6798982

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
{¶ 1} The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) is vacated and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in light of Schwartz v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 143 Ohio St.3d 496 , 2015-Ohio-3431 , 39 N.E.3d 1223 , which addressed a property located in close proximity to the property at issue here and which held that a recent arm’s-length sale price of $5,000 was the value of the property. On remand, the BTA shall consider the $5,000 válue of the Schwartz property along with all the other evidence currently in the record to determine the value of the property at issue.
Decision vacated and cause remanded.
O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
Kennedy and French, JJ., dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6798982. Public record. Not legal advice.